Process

Burger scene development

Evaluation of the scene:

I liked how this scene turned out, with the lighting I used it gave it a homely look. What I could improve on however is I could off added a few more living room objects in the room or added little bits of more detail e.g. coffee ring stain on table. Also compared to all the other objects in the room the tv remote is a little less realistic looking, so I could re model it to look a little but more fitting in the room.

Snapshot from the finished animation

Development video:

This is a video showing how the burger scene developed.

Reference:

A video of my living room, I was testing out how the movement of nodding your head would go and what you would see in the scene of a living room.

First render:

For this first render I chose quite bold colours, I liked how the colours drew your attention too the scene however because I want to make the scene look like a real living room I decided that this bold look wasn’t right for it.

Second render:

For this second render I chose more realistic colours, however I thought the scene looked a bit dull with the colouring and not very homely. For the final render to give it more of a homely atmosphere I changed some of the colours and the flooring as the flooring didn’t work well. I also added more living room objects and changed the lighting. when I changed the lighting it really brought the whole scene together and gave it a nice living room atmosphere.

Render improvement notes:

Sketches and the scene in Cinema 4D:

Idea behind the scene:

Standard
Artist research

Charlotte Taylor

https://www.instagram.com/charlottetaylr/?hl=en

Interior/Set Designer/Creative Director

Charlotte creates incredibly realistic room layouts in Cinema 4D

I love her work and how realistic it looks, also with her golden natural lighting she gives some pieces of her work a dreamy look which I could experiment with giving “what you see” scenes a nice dreamy lighting look and giving “what they see” scenes a cold lighting look. This could help showing the contrast between a dreamy ignorant way of seeing the world, ignoring the bad going on vs the cold harsh reality of the sate of the climate.

Standard
Research

Pixel art style

This is the retro pixel art style, these examples show it in a very retro old style way and also in a very modern more detailed way.

The classic game space invaders was pixel art so by making Rocket Rampage pixel art style it could give a nostalgic feeling to it relating back to its space game past of space invaders.

However by making it pixel art I don’t want it to look like too similar to space invaders, I want to give it its own unique look and style.

Chucklefish games

chucklefish games have a unique pixel art look, they have created a modern style twist to the pixel style look. Using very small pixels they make their visuals more detailed and also using shading to add detail. I really love the visual look of all there games.

Standard
Research.

Plastic Pollution- wwf

https://www.wwf.org.uk/fight-plastic-pollution

Eight million tonnes of plastic are dumped in our oceans every year, choking our wildlife. Plastic pollution is the most visible example of the havoc we’re causing to our planet. From our local beaches to the remote Arctic, it is choking our oceans and killing wildlife.

And it’s getting worse. Without a global response, there could be more plastic in the sea than fish by 2050.

Standard
Animations

Cinema 4d and After Effects animation

In this animation i’ve combined both 3D and 2D animation. I made the space background including the spinning planets in Cinema 4D and the foreground of the car driving along the road in Adobe Illustrator and animated it in after effects. I gave it a Synthwave art style look and colour scheme and I paired it with very chill and relaxing hip hop music to give it a relaxed look and atmosphere. It could be used for an animation to pair with relaxing music for a music video.

I made this because I wanted to experiment with combining both types of animation and I think it went well for my first time.

Standard
Research.

WWF- The effects of deforestation

https://www.wwf.org.uk/learn/effects-of/deforestation

https://www.wwf.org.uk/10-myths-about-deforestation

IN THE TIME IT TAKES TO SAY ‘DEFORESTATION’, ANOTHER CHUNK OF FOREST THE SIZE OF A FOOTBALL PITCH IS DESTROYED.

That’s every two seconds, every single day.  

And we’re not including commercially grown trees and plantations. We mean natural, noisy forests that were full of life, and home to threatened species such as orangutans and jaguars.  

There’s only about half the number of trees on the planet today that there were when humans first evolved. And the fastest rate of forest destruction has been in the past couple of centuries. 

Up to 15 billion trees are now being cut down every year across the world. It’s just not sustainable, or very smart – for wildlife, for people, or for the climate. 

Deforestation affects us all, whether we realise it or not. 

WHY FORESTS MATTER:

Forests are vital for the health of our planet. They provide food and shelter for so much of life on Earth – from fungi and insects to tigers and elephants.  More than half the world’s land-based plants and animals, and three-quarters of all birds, live in and around forests. 

Forests have a big influence on rainfall patterns, water and soil quality and flood prevention too. Millions of people rely directly on forests as their home or for making a living. 

But the risks from deforestation go even wider. Trees absorb and store carbon dioxide. If forests are cleared, or even disturbed, they release carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.  Forest loss and damage is the cause of around 10% of global warming. There’s simply no way we can fight the climate crisis if we don’t stop deforestation.   

WHAT’S DESTROYING FORESTS?

Most deforestation is carried out to clear land for food production. This is not a new thing – for instance in the UK we largely cleared our natural forests centuries ago to create more agricultural land.

The majority of the deforestation is linked to  meat, soya and palm oil. Huge swathes of tropical forest are removed so the land can be used for growing soya to feed farm animals like pigs and poultry. All to meet the insatiable global demand for cheap meat. In tropical and subtropical countries, agriculture has accounted for 73% of deforestation. 

Even though the damage is mainly done to tropical forests, the causes can be linked to eating habits all around the world – including here in the UK. Our footprint is mainly linked to soya grown to feed British reared animals.  So the chicken and bacon in our shops may well be unwittingly contributing to global deforestation.  

HOW WE’RE FIGHTING DEFORESTATION

We co-founded the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), whose tick logo on wood and paper products helps shoppers identify and support sustainable forest management. And we were founder members of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), who’ve improved and expanded the sources of responsibly-produced palm oil.  

Plus we helped bring in legislation to prevent illegal timber being sold in the UK. In 2014, dozens of high-profile firms signed up to our Forest Campaign, including Argos, B&Q, Carillion, M&S, Penguin Random House and Sainsbury’s. They all pledged their wood and paper would be legally and sustainably sourced by 2020.  

We’ve had our successes, but the challenges keep growing too. We helped reduce deforestation in the Amazon by 75% between 2004 and 2012. But since then deforestation has been on the increase, with the highest rate of deforestation in a decade recorded in 2018.

HOW YOU CAN HELP SAVE FORESTS

There are lots of things we can all do, right now, to protect the world’s forests. For instance, choose recycled paper products and look for the FSC ‘tick-tree’ logo when you’re shopping.  

But your diet has the biggest impact. If you haven’t already, think about moderating the amount of meat you eat, perhaps considering it a weekend treat. And experiment with plant-based ingredients instead – there are plenty of new, innovative alternatives on offer now.

Also, make sure any palm oil in the products you buy is sustainably sourced – it may say RSPO on the label. 

It’s not palm oil that’s the problem, it’s how and where it’s grown that needs to change. Palm oil is an incredibly efficient and productive crop, producing more oil per land area than any other equivalent vegetable oil crop. Globally, it supplies 35% of the of the world’s vegetable oil demand on just 10% of the global land used to grow vegetable oil crops.  To get the same amount of vegetable oil from equivalent crops like soybean or coconut could require anything between 4 and 10 times more land, which would just shift the problem to other parts of the world and threaten other habitats and species. 

Boycotting palm oil could therefore cause more deforestation not less. So we need companies to use only sustainable palm oil that respects and safeguards people and nature and should boycott those companies that don’t! 

Standard